Interview for Hans-Jürgen Gerung
The
first question is always the classic one: how does it start your love
and interest for guitar and what instruments do you play or have you
played?
My
first encounter with the guitar came early, when I was just 6 or 7.
My father loved it very much and I remember every time we had guests
he would start playing and singing. Therefore I had a strong
experience in what it means to make music. And so, my father became
my first guitar teacher.
What
was your musical training, with which teachers have you studied and
what impression they left in your music?
My
musical education began on the trumpet (the instrument I love most
after the guitar – and later on I studied this marvelous instrument
together with the guitar. Breath control is such an important
technique in the world of brass instruments and it makes you feel
with the whole body how a musical phrase works. So this helped me a
lot in creating my personal art of playing the guitar for my practice
was never only technically oriented. I always kept the line in my
mind. My trumpet Teacher was Prof. Wolfgang Siegert – Solo trumpet
player at the Theater
Fortunately
my professor at the Leopold Mozart Conservatory of Augsburg, Franz
Mayr-Musiol had the same approach for playing the guitar – because
his main profession was playing the double bass in several orchestras
(amongst
others at the Münchener Rundfunkorchester)!
So also for him playing the guitar means to place the instrument into
the service of the big picture that we call making music.
I
know that you have studied with Sylvano Bussotti … how it was to
study with him?
The
impact of Bussotti was enormous - especially his appreciation of
arts. He’s not only one of the greatest composers of the 20th
century; he’s also an extraordinary teacher. He has the rare gift
to explain complex correlations in a pretty simple way (without
banalizing them). Sometimes he could cut through the Gordian knot
with a single word. Extraordinary! But being the student of such a
charismatic personality implies the threat becoming the master’s
epigone. I’d like to say that the greatest effort during my time
with M° Bussotti (and the biggest profit for myself) was manifesting
myself as an independent artist. And he helped a lot to peak out:
Once,
during an interrogation, I explained my score studies (at
that time I worked intensively on the Six
Bagatelles
for string quartet
by Anton Webern)
– Bussotti raised concerns not to exaggerate these studies: ‘It’s
undoubtedly necessary to know what was and were we come from but
remember, ever hour of your life that you are working with the arts
from others you do not push on your own! – for this you have to
weigh your worthy time; your main challenge is to create arts not to
study others!’
You
have played Ermafrodito, one of his most famous guitar’s score in
world premiere in 2000, can you explain us this passage? I have seen
the score and .. it’s like a picture .. a piece of art…
Yes,
in 1999 I decided to commission a new guitar solo piece by M°
Bussotti and he agreed immediately, and he wrote Ermafrodito,
fantasia
mitologica per chitarra and beyond that he applied a notation on the
score ‘commissioned by Hans-Jürgen Gerung for his interpretation
only’. Giving me the exclusive rights to be for about 10 years the
only one playing that score was a great honor for me.
I
think if you want to play Ermafrodito
(or lots of other scores) you should know some important things
beforehand.
1st
Bussotti’s
art often is embedded in Greek mythology. Not only as music’s
concerned also his poetry (for
example the poem ‘efebo,
Febo lingua e abbronzatura’),
his numerous paintings that he did during his activities as art
director, costume designer, regisseur etc. are filled with analogies.
For this you have to be sure about aesthetics of the Greeks.
2nd
Bussotti’s
music is (like Mozart’s) written for stage! – it’s always
dramatic in a scenic sense; even if the score is solo instrumental.
For this you have to create a fictitious stage setting in your mind’s
eye at every phrase you play; you have to animate all the
protagonists that you find in the piece.
3rd
Bussotti’s
music has always to do with himself, regardless of persons, things,
scenes (even long ago) – for this you have to know a lot about his
biography, or better you should talk to him as often as possible
about the score you’d like to realize.
Ermafrodito
arrived three weeks before an upcoming working session at Florence
(GAMO
= gruppo aperto di musica oggi)
in late summer of 1999. Though we met there for composing together I
was pretty sure that Bussotti would expect me to play the entire
piece … and so it was! Fortunately I worked like a madman to get
familiar with the score. At Florence I was confronted with the fact
that Bussotti had already arranged a conference at the concert hall
at the Conservatory Luigi Cherubini for an off-the-record
presentation from Ermafrodito.
The
world première indeed was in May 2002 at the Teatro Carignano at
Turin (together with the choreographer Luca Veggetti and the dance
company from Loredana Furno.)
You
said ‘it’s like a picture …’ No, I wouldn’t say so. Because
the graphical notation, the pictography (often
used in Bussotti’s scores)
is not applied in the entire piece. Bussotti uses rather let’s say,
dendritical notation. This kind of notation is place-saving and also
very efficient. The musical impact indeed is a greater freedom of
rhythmical expression as you have to play the notated notes in the
determinate space of time but how you organize the length of each
note is fairly free. Compared with Bussotti’s guitar piece Ultima
rara
written in ‘millenocecensessantanove’ for Siegfried Behrend,
Ermafrodito
is more virtuosic and filled with poetical phrases – but I’d say
it’s less vanguard. Ultima
rara
uses
a really dense score (one step ahead and Bussotti would have used the
pictography by force to realize his musical thoughts. Look at his
Quintett Rara
eco sireologico;
there you’ll find lots of phrases used in Ultima
rara
… and there you find also a large pictographical aria. Ermafrodito
however picks some of the thoughts of these two early scores
(especially
in the 5th
movement <<Farinello>>)
but the greatest deal of the score is complete new material that you
won’t find neither in Ultima
rara,
nor in Rara
eco sireologico,
neither in the guitar score form Nuovo
Scenario a Lorenzaccio,
nor in that form Circo
minore.
I’d
like to say, Ermafrodito
is somewhat a pocket opera for one guitar player and the theme is M°
Bussotti on a walk through his life and through his garden in
Genazzano, nearby Rome:
Seven
movements:
1st
movement:
E
I fiori
We
enter the RARA-gate to his Villa and the scene of an overwhelming
floridity interfused by glistening sunlight takes place.
2nd
movement:
chitarronata
- a gay-scene with some dancing and drinking (may be similar to efebo, Febo lingua e abbronzatura cf. ‘Non fare il minimo rumore – Edizione del Girasole pag. 53)
- suddenly the thoughts went forty years back …
3rd
movement:
dôme
épais
- the scene changes – we see the young author in the audience of an opera; given is
Léo
Delibes, Lakmé:
the flower Duet <>
4th
movement:
Upupa
- Suddenly the cry of the hoopoe is hearable and brings us back in the garden.
(the
Wiedehopf - as we call him in Germany - was a permanent guest in
Bussotti’s garden as he told me often). With courageous steps we
walk the line … but lost in thoughts.
5th
movement:
Farinello
- Again an opera scene – Carlo Broschi detto Il Farinello is jumping in the picture, singing nerve-racking arias.
6th
movement:
foto
di me, fanciullo
- Again drifting in the past – a picture appears with an young artist; the whole sene in a camera oscura.
7th
movement:
statua
- immortal things appear – not just marble statues but also great Italian poetry. Guarini recites his famous poetry <
>>. And meanwhile the words reach Bussotti’s ear he remembers an old melody from the Sicilian Renaissance Composer Gio. Pietro Flaccomini (cf. Musiche Rinascimentale Siciliane (MRS) Bd. VI, Nr. XXIII.) – and, still walking in the garden, he takes the melody, changes it, and –forceful -together with the melody he manipulates the Guarini Text and the recreation is the genial finale:
<
(because he finished the score on July 23) lumimiei
cari q’unsíveloceguardo
mirafugge
Ch’oggetto mai con
non
verrete più cotanto vostro sia
giustodesío quanto sonio>>
Finally
I’d like to highlight that Bussotti wrote Ermafrodito
for my 10-string guitar (and its particular tuning) and only this
instrument allows the necessary full sound and the sustain of the
bass – basically in the 3rd
movement.
Berio in his essay "A remembrance to the future," wrote: ".. A pianist who is a specialist about classical and romantic repertoire, and plays Beethoven and Chopin without knowing the music of the twentieth century, is also off as a pianist who is specialist about contemporary music and plays with hands and mind that have never been crossed in depth by Beethoven and Chopin. " You play both traditional classical and contemporary repertoire ... do you recognize yourself in these words?
Playing
contemporary music for me is normal, who else but we living artists
should play it? Sure, sometimes the approach in solving problems
during the realization of a contemporary score might be helpful for
finding solutions in old scores but that is not the reason I’m
playing the music of our times.
I
always found it helpful to converge to a score (irrespective whether
it’s old or new) with all my knowledge, respect and heart – and
then, after I’ve done all my duties, I’ll give my judgment. And
sometimes the upshot was the decision not to perform the piece …
after all the work I did!
I
think the question is not the legitimacy of the contemporary music
What
does improvisation mean for your music research? Do you think it’s
possible to talk about improvisation for classical music or we have
to turn to other repertories like jazz, contemporary music, etc.?
Improvisation
is (and was) an important field of the music and every now and then I
like doing it. The great denotation during the baroque-period and
earlier was remarkable (remember the improvisation-meetings between
Johann Sebastian Bach and Silvius Leopold Weiss) but unfortunately it
lost more and more significance. In the world of Rock- and Pop- and
Jazz music it’s still alive but the results seem somewhat like
interchangeable goods. Few instruments play on determinate scales-
and chord-patterns and so are the results. If we understand
improvisation as creare musica al improvviso we should liberate our
music from all determinate systems. This could create something
really new and this would ennoble these new and sudden creations as
compositions born from a mastermind – not born out of the fingers.
But that is a great array – also our dodecaphonic system is a
determinate one … isn’t it?
What’s
the role of the “Error” in your musical vision? For “error” I
mean an incorrect procedure, an irregularity in the normal operation
of a mechanism, a discontinuity on an otherwise uniform surface that
can lead to new developments and unexpected surprises
The
horrifying error - I consider him being the Angelus. He gave my
scores always the turn to a better level – even to its best.
If
you had to choose, who is your favorite composer to play?
John
Sebastian Bach
I
have, sometimes, the feeling that in our times music’s history
flows without a particular interest in its chronological course, in
our discotheque before and after, past and future become
interchangeable elements, shall this be a risk of a uniform vision
for an interpreter and a composer?
The
risk of a musical "globalization"?
Yes
it is, and what I mentioned above when you asked me what
improvisation means for me applies here as well. The beats, the whole
rhythm, the instrumental canon, the scales the lyrics – all seems
more and more synchronized all over the world. Making music, or
better making new music (and that should be our goal) means really
very very strong efforts. Making music is always an extensive search
– a search also to an own an individual language. By the way, it
does not mean the search for commercial success.
Let’s
talk about marketing. How much do you think it’s important for a
modern musician? I mean: how much is crucial to be good promoters of
themselves and their works in music today?
The
knowledge in marketing is not only important for the modern musician
– it was important all the time. After the birth of your artwork
you have to look after it – help him to survive. There will never
be one (no agent, no manager, no producer) that defends your art with
such an enormous effort more so than you. So your job is twice:
creating arts and defending arts. Too much for one live and for this
we need helpful organizations that we can trust in. That’s
difficult because we all are a bit egomaniacal and egomaniacs
scarcely affiliate.
Which
composer (or which historical movement) do you think is easiest for
the non-musician listener to appreciate? Do you think they enjoy
pieces that are more technically difficult or just more "flashy"?
I’d
say the romantic period could be a somewhat easy door to open. This
period offers an enormous amount of different music that still has
strong connections to our times (autonomous form i-phone 6 and brave
new world); it’s talking about love and tragedy, about outage and
success; it’s virtuous and flashy as well.
Please
tell us five essential records, to have always with you .. the
classic five discs for the desert island ...
Carlo
Gesualdo da Venosa: Responsoria, => collegium vocale, Gent,
2013
Johann
Sebastian Bach: Johannes Passion => Philippe Herreweghe, 1987
Munir
Bashir: IRAK – l’art du ûd => Munir Bashir, 1971
Frank
Zappa: The yellow shark, => Ensemble modern, 1992/93
Hans-Jürgen
Gerung: aus meinem Leben => Sampler, 2014
What
are your five favorite scores?
John
Cage: => Sonatas and Interludes for prepared piano (1946-48),
Ed. Peters
Sylvano
Bussotti: => ΦΑΙΔΡΑ
/ HELIOGABALUS (1975-81), Ricordi
Johann
Sebastian Bach: => Aufs Lautenwerck, edition-gerung
György
Ligeti: => Requiem (1963-65), Ed. Peters
Hans-Jürgen
Gerung: => RITUS-Missa da Requiem (2002-03), edition-gerung
With
who would you like to play? What kind of music do you listen to
usually?
I’d
like to jam with Naseer Shamma, Nigel North and STING.
Usually
I listen to chamber music – basically string Quartets but also
choir music, Dowland songs
(I
can’t get enough of it) and of course my own music.
Your
next projects?
upcoming
concerts:
- 20. September 2014, Basilika St. Lorenz, Kempten:
ensemble
cantissimo:
German première
of my motets: ecce
tu pulchra es / ecce tu pulcher es
for mixes choir
and soloists.
(Commissioned by M° Stefano
Sabene, Schola
Romana Ensemble
in 2006 / world première in 2007, Rome)
- 18. December 2014, concert hall Immenstadt:
College-Orchestra
Immenstadt:
World première
of my piece I
have news for you
for Orchestra, Choir, various Solo-singers and Instrumental-soloists.
upcoming
compositions:
- piano cycles in 5 movements for the Japanese Pianist Mai Fukasawa, http://www.maifukasawa.com/english.html
When
we will see you playing in Italy?
I’d
really like to do a concert in Naples. I prepared a very interesting
program that has a closer relation to this town because there are
several pieces from the Neapolitan composers Luigi Esposito and Carlo
Gesualdo da Venosa.
►Luigi
Esposito, (*1962) nell'aria
un madrigale (written for H.J. Gerung)
▪
for guitar
►Hans-Jürgen
Gerung (*1960) La Commedia
dell'arte
▪
for 10string guitar
►Carlo Gesualdo da
Venosa (*1566-1613) Gagliarda
del Principe
▪
arranged for Renaissance lute by H.-J. Gerung
►Luigi
Esposito: wanted (written for H.J. Gerung)
▪
for guitar and electric guitar
►Sylvano
Bussotti, (*1931) Ermafrodito (written for H.J.
Gerung)
▪ for 10string
guitar
►Carlo Gesualdo da
Venosa (*1566-1613) Canzon del
Principe
▪
arranged for Renaissance lute by H.-J. Gerung
►Luigi Esposito: Roseo
velato (written for H.J. Gerung)
▪
for guitar
But
‘till now I did not find a festival organizer who was interested;
maybe the year 2016 the 450 anniversary of Carlo Gesualdo offers a
possibility – vediamo.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento